> > Pelosi: we have to pass the health care bill so that you can find out > > what is in it
> Has to be near the top of any list of idiotic statements by a > legislator.
But she said it with that stupid smile she keeps on her face all the time so she must be sincere.
-- "Guy flops top set and a queen high flush in a $5 omaha donkathon and you expect him to fold? The only moron here is you." - CincinnatiKid to Beldin 01/13/10
_____________________________________________________________________ : the next generation of web-newsreaders : http://www.recgroups.com
>> > Pelosi: we have to pass the health care bill so that you can find out >> > what is in it
>> What she means is, people will be happy once the bill is passed and >> they experience the benefits.
>Sure, that's it. BWAHAHAHAHAHA
Of course not. Let's take a 5-second sentence fragment out of context and assume that the speaker meant it in the stupidest possible way. -- ~ Seth Jackson
> >> > Pelosi: we have to pass the health care bill so that you can find out > >> > what is in it
> >> What she means is, people will be happy once the bill is passed and > >> they experience the benefits.
> >Sure, that's it. BWAHAHAHAHAHA
> Of course not. Let's take a 5-second sentence fragment out of context > and assume that the speaker meant it in the stupidest possible way. > -- > ~ Seth Jackson
> >> > Pelosi: we have to pass the health care bill so that you can find out > >> > what is in it
> >> What she means is, people will be happy once the bill is passed and > >> they experience the benefits.
> >Sure, that's it. BWAHAHAHAHAHA
> Of course not. Let's take a 5-second sentence fragment out of context > and assume that the speaker meant it in the stupidest possible way. > -- > ~ Seth Jackson
> > >> > Pelosi: we have to pass the health care bill so that you can find out > > >> > what is in it
> > >> What she means is, people will be happy once the bill is passed and > > >> they experience the benefits.
> > >Sure, that's it. BWAHAHAHAHAHA
> > Of course not. Let's take a 5-second sentence fragment out of context > > and assume that the speaker meant it in the stupidest possible way. > > -- > > ~ Seth Jackson
> I can take a few words of your own and make you look like...well, I can make > you look like the idiot you are.
> "This forum isn't a formal debate or a contest of logic..." > - Alim Nassor
> Which means you get to win every time!
> Jim- Hide quoted text -
> - Show quoted text -
Yes Fuckwad, I said exactly that and meant it. This is a place to exchange ideas and have informal discussions. People like you try to hide behind formal debate rules and formal logic procedures when it suits you, such as when you are afraid to answer direct questions.
Your idea of logic is something to hide behind when a direct question is asked that you don't want to answer.
> >> I can take a few words of your own and make you look like...well, I can > >> make > >> you look like the idiot you are.
> >> "This forum isn't a formal debate or a contest of logic..." > >> - Alim Nassor
> >> Which means you get to win every time!
> > Yes Fuckwad, I said exactly that and meant it...
> I KNOW!!!
> That's why you look like such a fucking idiot.
> Jim
Were you, or any other poster here required to read Smith's Debate Rules? Or attend a class in logic? Is it a prerequisite bfore posting that these things be done? Of course not asswipe. That is precisely why I said it is not a "formal debate" or a "contest".
This is more like bullshitting around a campfire. And just like in real life one of the bullshitters is a complete ass. That would be you..
>> >> > Pelosi: we have to pass the health care bill so that you can find out >> >> > what is in it
>> >> What she means is, people will be happy once the bill is passed and >> >> they experience the benefits.
>> >Sure, that's it. BWAHAHAHAHAHA
>> Of course not. Let's take a 5-second sentence fragment out of context >> and assume that the speaker meant it in the stupidest possible way. >> -- >> ~ Seth Jackson
Here's that logic thing at work again. I'm not the one who provided the out-of-context quote and then ridiculed it. I'm the one who's pointing out that it's an out-of-context quote. I'm not the one who's claiming it as evidence of stupidity. I'm the one pointing out that we really don't know what she meant by it.
It's this thing know as "burden of proof". You want to use the quote as evidence of anything, then you need to prove that it means what you claim it does.
See how logic works in a debate? -- ~ Seth Jackson
<alimnas...@yahoo.com> wrote: >> >> "This forum isn't a formal debate or a contest of logic..." >> >> - Alim Nassor
>> >> Which means you get to win every time!
>> > Yes Fuckwad, I said exactly that and meant it...
>> I KNOW!!!
>> That's why you look like such a fucking idiot.
>> Jim
>Were you, or any other poster here required to read Smith's Debate >Rules? Or attend a class in logic? Is it a prerequisite bfore >posting that these things be done? Of course not asswipe. That is >precisely why I said it is not a "formal debate" or a "contest".
What does Smith's Debate Rules have to do with anything? Can you point to some examples of where they've been invoked? -- ~ Seth Jackson
>> >> >> "This forum isn't a formal debate or a contest of logic..." >> >> >> - Alim Nassor
>> >> >> Which means you get to win every time!
>> >> > Yes Fuckwad, I said exactly that and meant it...
>> >> I KNOW!!!
>> >> That's why you look like such a fucking idiot.
>> > And why you look like such a fucking coward.
>> For what? Pointing and laughing YET AGAIN at your inability to deal with >> the simplest logical arguments like a grownup?
>> Cowards aren't here in your face like I am, Serpiquit.
>> Jim
>LOL In my face on the internet!!. You are sooooo manly.
If nothing he does on the Internet can show manliness or bravery, then how is it possible for anything on the Internet to show cowardice? -- ~ Seth Jackson
> >> >> > Pelosi: we have to pass the health care bill so that you can find out > >> >> > what is in it
> >> >> What she means is, people will be happy once the bill is passed and > >> >> they experience the benefits.
> >> >Sure, that's it. BWAHAHAHAHAHA
> >> Of course not. Let's take a 5-second sentence fragment out of context > >> and assume that the speaker meant it in the stupidest possible way. > >> -- > >> ~ Seth Jackson
> Here's that logic thing at work again. I'm not the one who provided > the out-of-context quote and then ridiculed it. I'm the one who's > pointing out that it's an out-of-context quote. I'm not the one > who's claiming it as evidence of stupidity. I'm the one pointing out > that we really don't know what she meant by it.
> It's this thing know as "burden of proof". You want to use the quote > as evidence of anything, then you need to prove that it means what you > claim it does.
> See how logic works in a debate? > -- > ~ Seth Jackson
> >> >> >> "This forum isn't a formal debate or a contest of logic..." > >> >> >> - Alim Nassor
> >> >> >> Which means you get to win every time!
> >> >> > Yes Fuckwad, I said exactly that and meant it...
> >> >> I KNOW!!!
> >> >> That's why you look like such a fucking idiot.
> >> > And why you look like such a fucking coward.
> >> For what? Pointing and laughing YET AGAIN at your inability to deal with > >> the simplest logical arguments like a grownup?
> >> Cowards aren't here in your face like I am, Serpiquit.
> >> Jim
> >LOL In my face on the internet!!. You are sooooo manly.
> If nothing he does on the Internet can show manliness or bravery, then > how is it possible for anything on the Internet to show cowardice? > -- > ~ Seth Jackson
His cowardice is well documented. Trying to overcome it by boasting about being in my face doesn't work. No one said nothing he does on the internet can show bravery. That was an illogical leap there Pepe. He could start by not redirecting anymore, by not hiding behind his junior high debate club rules when he doesn't want to answer a question.
> Pepe. He could start by not redirecting anymore, by not hiding behind > his junior high debate club rules when he doesn't want to answer a > question.
> > Pepe. He could start by not redirecting anymore, by not hiding behind > > his junior high debate club rules when he doesn't want to answer a > > question.
> Priceless.
> Jim
Yes it is because we all know no matter how hard you try, your true color will show. Yellow.
> > Pepe. He could start by not redirecting anymore, by not hiding behind > > his junior high debate club rules when he doesn't want to answer a > > question.
> Priceless.
> Jim
Yes it is because we all know no matter how hard you try, your true color will show. Yellow.
=======================================
Witless. Utterly witless.
The funny part is that you don't even know what that means.
> > > Pepe. He could start by not redirecting anymore, by not hiding behind > > > his junior high debate club rules when he doesn't want to answer a > > > question.
> > Priceless.
> > Jim
> Yes it is because we all know no matter how hard you try, your true > color will show. Yellow.
> =======================================
> Witless. Utterly witless.
> The funny part is that you don't even know what that means.
> Jim
A sad bitter old freak like you claiming someone else is witless. Ok.
|
