Having seen a number of complaints about Beldin wasting bandwidth by posting useless pokers hands (in $2 tournaments), with a lack of analyzing (other than calling the other player, "Shithead" or "Idiot,") I believe we've ended that madness.
Since bitch-slapping him for not analyzing (like player's position, previous play or bluffing) we haven't seen another Bel-Dum poker hand. (Although, it might be he's broke and can't find a 50 cent tournament. Perhaps after payday at Wal-Mart).
If he does post another one; we'll assume he'll have been shamed into analyzing it, to some extent.
> Having seen a number of complaints about Beldin wasting bandwidth by posting > useless pokers hands (in $2 tournaments), with a lack of analyzing (other > than calling the other player, "Shithead" or "Idiot,") I believe we've ended > that madness.
It's not hard. Add him to your kill file. Problem solved!
"This has got to be some sports-related crap, that's all Raiderfan gives a fuck about." -- Paul Popinjay 2/27/09
> On Jul 31 2010 12:04 PM, Jerry Sturdivant wrote:
> > A method for fighting Beldin's madness!
> > Having seen a number of complaints about Beldin wasting bandwidth by posting > > useless pokers hands (in $2 tournaments), with a lack of analyzing (other > > than calling the other player, "Shithead" or "Idiot,") I believe we've ended > > that madness.
> It's not hard. Add him to your kill file. Problem solved!
Whether you like reading his posts or not, Beldin is one of the few people here who still post any poker content at all.
> "This has got to be some sports-related crap, that's all Raiderfan gives a > fuck about." -- Paul Popinjay 2/27/09
> Having seen a number of complaints about Beldin wasting bandwidth by > posting useless pokers hands (in $2 tournaments), with a lack of analyzing > (other than calling the other player, "Shithead" or "Idiot,") I believe > we've ended that madness.
> Since bitch-slapping him for not analyzing (like player's position, > previous play or bluffing) we haven't seen another Bel-Dum poker hand. > (Although, it might be he's broke and can't find a 50 cent tournament. > Perhaps after payday at Wal-Mart).
Jerry the shithead, ladies and gentlemen!
I haven't played a hand on-line in a week. She's home from the hospital and I'm taking care of her.
> If he does post another one; we'll assume he'll have been shamed into > analyzing it, to some extent.
Jerry, all we know for sure is you're a complete moron
> On Jul 31 2010 12:04 PM, Jerry Sturdivant wrote:
> > A method for fighting Beldin's madness!
> > Having seen a number of complaints about Beldin wasting bandwidth by posting > > useless pokers hands (in $2 tournaments), with a lack of analyzing (other > > than calling the other player, "Shithead" or "Idiot,") I believe we've ended > > that madness.
> It's not hard. Add him to your kill file. Problem solved!
More likely Jerry 'numb nuts from vegas' plans to re-launch his tin foil hat business.
Irish Mike
"As an American, I am not shocked that Obama was given the Nobel Peace Prize without any accomplishments to his name. America gave him the White House based on the same credentials." Newt Gingrich
Jerry Sturdivant wrote: > A method for fighting Beldin's madness!
> Having seen a number of complaints about Beldin wasting bandwidth by posting > useless pokers hands (in $2 tournaments), with a lack of analyzing (other > than calling the other player, "Shithead" or "Idiot,") I believe we've ended > that madness.
Who is making these complaints? Either KF him or simply don't respond. It's not really that hard. And how much "analysis" can you do of a hand in a $2 tournament? When the opponent's thought process consists of *drool* err, I have AJ! *drool* a reraise? All-in! *drool*, it's like analyzing why your dog licks its own balls.
Your so-called analysis consisted of 1) getting the result of the hand wrong, 2) making up a meaningless term "bluff angle", and 3) referencing Super/System for no particular reason.
> Since bitch-slapping him for not analyzing (like player's position, previous > play or bluffing) we haven't seen another Bel-Dum poker hand. (Although, it > might be he's broke and can't find a 50 cent tournament. Perhaps after > payday at Wal-Mart).
> If he does post another one; we'll assume he'll have been shamed into > analyzing it, to some extent.
> You're welcome!
> Jerry (doing public service) 'n Vegas
You want to do some real public service for RGP? I recommend a life fold.
> Jerry Sturdivant wrote: > > A method for fighting Beldin's madness!
> > Having seen a number of complaints about Beldin wasting bandwidth by posting > > useless pokers hands (in $2 tournaments), with a lack of analyzing (other > > than calling the other player, "Shithead" or "Idiot,") I believe we've ended > > that madness.
> Who is making these complaints? Either KF him or simply don't respond. > It's not really that hard. And how much "analysis" can you do of a > hand in a $2 tournament? When the opponent's thought process consists > of *drool* err, I have AJ! *drool* a reraise? All-in! *drool*, it's > like analyzing why your dog licks its own balls.
> Your so-called analysis consisted of 1) getting the result of the hand > wrong, 2) making up a meaningless term "bluff angle", and 3) > referencing Super/System for no particular reason.
> > Since bitch-slapping him for not analyzing (like player's position, previous > > play or bluffing) we haven't seen another Bel-Dum poker hand. (Although, it > > might be he's broke and can't find a 50 cent tournament. Perhaps after > > payday at Wal-Mart).
> > If he does post another one; we'll assume he'll have been shamed into > > analyzing it, to some extent.
> > You're welcome!
> > Jerry (doing public service) 'n Vegas
> You want to do some real public service for RGP? I recommend a life > fold.
/thread /Jerry
--- Morphy xaqmor...@donkeymanifesto.com http://www.donkeymanifesto.com -If I never left, does that mean that I'm back now, or have I always been here?
______________________________________________________________________ * kill-files, watch-lists, favorites, and more.. www.recgroups.com
> Jerry Sturdivant wrote: >> A method for fighting Beldin's madness!
>> Having seen a number of complaints about Beldin wasting bandwidth by >> posting >> useless pokers hands (in $2 tournaments), with a lack of analyzing (other >> than calling the other player, "Shithead" or "Idiot,") I believe we've >> ended >> that madness.
> Who is making these complaints?
If you were a regular, you'd have seen them. You'll have to find some way to do your own search.
> Either KF him or simply don't respond.
It was a thread. (And you might try taking your own advice).
> It's not really that hard. And how much "analysis" can > you do of a hand in a $2 tournament?
They same you could do in a $100 tournament.
> When the opponent's thought process consists > of *drool* err, I have AJ! *drool* a reraise? All-in! *drool*, it's > like analyzing why your dog licks its own balls.
Well, like William said, "I'd play if no money was involved." Money is simply a scorekeeping method.
> Your so-called analysis consisted of 1) getting the > result of the hand wrong,
Or your reading comprehension wrong. I didn't analyze a hand; I analyzed the poster.
> 2) making up a meaningless term "bluff angle",
Yet you address it because you knew what it meant. Looks like you could use some analyzing...
> and 3) referencing Super/System for no particular reason.
Yet you addressed that, too. (Although, now, you don't seem to know why).
You don't seen very good at dodging a thread. You play poker the same way?
Anyway, what I've done seems to have worked. Which means poor old Bel-Dim is in a quandary as to how to post his next 'Shithead' poker hand post: "Do I actually try analyzing the play? Or do I simply make my idiot diagnose of "Shithead!" and prove I'm still a fool?).
> Anyway, what I've done seems to have worked. Which means poor old Bel-Dim is > in a quandary as to how to post his next 'Shithead' poker hand post: "Do I > actually try analyzing the play? Or do I simply make my idiot diagnose of > "Shithead!" and prove I'm still a fool?).
Speaking of reading comprehension, you failed this one miserably Jerry. Not only has Beldin stated several times that he's not playing this week due to the fact that his wife had surgery and he's off of work taking care of her, he already posted a hand AFTER this thread.
That's 3 things I've pinned you down on now. This is your cue to stop replying. Hope this helps.
--- Morphy xaqmor...@donkeymanifesto.com http://www.donkeymanifesto.com -If I never left, does that mean that I'm back now, or have I always been here?
---- * kill-files, watch-lists, favorites, and more.. www.recgroups.com
>> Anyway, what I've done seems to have worked. Which means poor old Bel-Dim >> is >> in a quandary as to how to post his next 'Shithead' poker hand post: "Do >> I >> actually try analyzing the play? Or do I simply make my idiot diagnose of >> "Shithead!" and prove I'm still a fool?). > Speaking of reading comprehension, you failed this one miserably Jerry. > Not only has Beldin stated several times that he's not playing this week > due to the fact that his wife had surgery and he's off of work taking care > of her, he already posted a hand AFTER this thread.
The 'reading comprehension' problem is all yours. I posted no time line as to when he'd post, and that it refers to his quandary; not if he would post. And what part of 'next hand' don't you understand.
> That's 3 things I've pinned you down on now.
Heh. And I've just showed you didn't. Try to get back to the point, you're obviously having difficulty dodging.
> "XaQ Morphy" <a1c5...@webnntp.invalid> wrote in message > news:7jmji7xmqs.ln2@recgroups.com... >> On Aug 2 2010 2:47 PM, Jerry Sturdivant wrote:
>>> Anyway, what I've done seems to have worked. Which means poor old >>> Bel-Dim is >>> in a quandary as to how to post his next 'Shithead' poker hand post: "Do >>> I >>> actually try analyzing the play? Or do I simply make my idiot diagnose >>> of >>> "Shithead!" and prove I'm still a fool?).
>> Speaking of reading comprehension, you failed this one miserably Jerry. >> Not only has Beldin stated several times that he's not playing this week >> due to the fact that his wife had surgery and he's off of work taking >> care >> of her, he already posted a hand AFTER this thread.
> The 'reading comprehension' problem is all yours. I posted no time line as > to when he'd post, and that it refers to his quandary; not if he would > post. And what part of 'next hand' don't you understand.
>> That's 3 things I've pinned you down on now.
> Heh. And I've just showed you didn't. Try to get back to the point, you're > obviously having difficulty dodging.
Jerry, just how big a fucking shithead are you?
You said you had gotten me to STOP posting them, you pathetic moron
> Heh. And I've just showed you didn't. Try to get back to the point, you're > obviously having difficulty dodging.
It's really strange, because I very rarely find people that are actually too stupid to argue with, but here on RGP it's like there's a factory that churns them out. Say hi to all the idiots in my kill file, will ya? I think Russ is still in there, so you guys should have a swell time.
Seeya.
--- Morphy xaqmor...@donkeymanifesto.com http://www.donkeymanifesto.com -If I never left, does that mean that I'm back now, or have I always been here?
_______________________________________________________________________ RecGroups : the community-oriented newsreader : www.recgroups.com
>> "XaQ Morphy" <a1c5...@webnntp.invalid> wrote in message >> news:7jmji7xmqs.ln2@recgroups.com... >>> On Aug 2 2010 2:47 PM, Jerry Sturdivant wrote:
>>>> Anyway, what I've done seems to have worked. Which means poor old >>>> Bel-Dim is >>>> in a quandary as to how to post his next 'Shithead' poker hand post: >>>> "Do I >>>> actually try analyzing the play? Or do I simply make my idiot diagnose >>>> of >>>> "Shithead!" and prove I'm still a fool?).
>>> Speaking of reading comprehension, you failed this one miserably Jerry. >>> Not only has Beldin stated several times that he's not playing this week >>> due to the fact that his wife had surgery and he's off of work taking >>> care >>> of her, he already posted a hand AFTER this thread. >> The 'reading comprehension' problem is all yours. I posted no time line >> as to when he'd post, and that it refers to his quandary; not if he would >> post. And what part of 'next hand' don't you understand. >>> That's 3 things I've pinned you down on now. >> Heh. And I've just showed you didn't. Try to get back to the point, >> you're obviously having difficulty dodging. > Jerry, just how big a fucking shithead are you?
> You said you had gotten me to STOP posting them, you pathetic moron
No, I did not state that and you can't show where I did. My above statements remain valid. Read it and weep. I make mention to your next hand posting.
>> Heh. And I've just showed you didn't. Try to get back to the point, >> you're >> obviously having difficulty dodging.
> It's really strange, because I very rarely find people that are actually > too stupid to argue with, but here on RGP it's like there's a factory that > churns them out.
Yet you couldn't address my statement. I DID show you wrong.
> Say hi to all the idiots in my kill file, will ya?
That what people do when they can't address an argument. Run and hide.
>>> "XaQ Morphy" <a1c5...@webnntp.invalid> wrote in message >>> news:7jmji7xmqs.ln2@recgroups.com... >>>> On Aug 2 2010 2:47 PM, Jerry Sturdivant wrote:
>>>>> Anyway, what I've done seems to have worked. Which means poor old >>>>> Bel-Dim is >>>>> in a quandary as to how to post his next 'Shithead' poker hand post: >>>>> "Do I >>>>> actually try analyzing the play? Or do I simply make my idiot diagnose >>>>> of >>>>> "Shithead!" and prove I'm still a fool?).
>>>> Speaking of reading comprehension, you failed this one miserably Jerry. >>>> Not only has Beldin stated several times that he's not playing this >>>> week >>>> due to the fact that his wife had surgery and he's off of work taking >>>> care >>>> of her, he already posted a hand AFTER this thread.
>>> The 'reading comprehension' problem is all yours. I posted no time line >>> as to when he'd post, and that it refers to his quandary; not if he >>> would post. And what part of 'next hand' don't you understand.
>>>> That's 3 things I've pinned you down on now.
>>> Heh. And I've just showed you didn't. Try to get back to the point, >>> you're obviously having difficulty dodging.
>> Jerry, just how big a fucking shithead are you?
>> You said you had gotten me to STOP posting them, you pathetic moron
> No, I did not state that and you can't show where I did.
|
